Pages: [1] |
1. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Yeah lowsec took a big hit on this one i was opposed to it before it went though, and now all i see on dscan is af af af af af, all i can fly is af af af. Gonna give ewar frigs a shot always thought the sentinel looked cool, might give up and move...
- by Stukkler Tian - at 2012.02.07 04:43:00
|
2. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Like i said I cant argue with you because we are playing two different games, in your game this buff is very much needed and still keeps it balanced, In my game this buff is a body blow. Your game has more people and brings in new subs mine doesnt...
- by Stukkler Tian - at 2012.01.20 19:04:00
|
3. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
If your acting like the AF in its current form is some helpless and broken ship your an idiot. If your argument is yes AFs are good already they should just be better then I cant really argue with you. This is because we have fundamentally differe...
- by Stukkler Tian - at 2012.01.20 18:10:00
|
4. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
This guy did not strike me as a person who knows what he was talking about so my comment was more the real world your dumb dont talk kind of know your roll and less eve" your roll is heavy tackler." It does still apply. If the new role is as a hea...
- by Stukkler Tian - at 2012.01.20 15:05:00
|
5. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
um fit a vamp or a neut, know your roll
- by Stukkler Tian - at 2012.01.20 13:57:00
|
6. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I would rather fight a zealot or vega with my rifter than any of these new afs. However looks like its to late to change anything now they are just making it worse, Retribution with 7.5 tracking was really hoping they would move all the other af t...
- by Stukkler Tian - at 2012.01.20 06:39:00
|
7. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
you are right it doesnt help my argument but im still bringing it up because its awesome. on a side not what is the thorax vs vega matchup for t1 frigs and afs.
- by Stukkler Tian - at 2012.01.20 01:55:00
|
8. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Prometheus Exenthal wrote: Also wrong. The bad AFs have weaknesses. AFs are the heavy combat frigates. They already do, and should continue to, shred other Frigates. T1 Cruisers & Recons don't typically stand a chance against HACs, so by...
- by Stukkler Tian - at 2012.01.20 00:43:00
|
9. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edit: Alex and Hans are saying what im trying to say much better than i can myself so im gonna go ahead and remove this wallotext
- by Stukkler Tian - at 2012.01.18 02:03:00
|
10. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Prometheus Exenthal wrote: Much of the WTF has come from the same group of people posting over and over, sometimes on different accounts to give the impression of more people (ie: proxyyyy). They're also all empire dwellers, so that doesn't com...
- by Stukkler Tian - at 2012.01.17 20:27:00
|
11. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Prometheus Exenthal wrote: would be absolutely obliterated by a Crow or Raptor (the *worst* interceptors). the crow is actually a very dangerous intercepter when flown properly standard missle fits are brutal vs other kiters and very effect...
- by Stukkler Tian - at 2012.01.16 02:15:00
|
12. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
no worries my brain works the same way, cut out one mid because almost everything needs a prop
- by Stukkler Tian - at 2012.01.14 23:16:00
|
13. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Duchess Starbuckington wrote: It is however tremendously cap dependant and lacks both a second mid and good speed, so range dictation can be difficult. Im assuming by second mid you mean 3rd for a web, You are right it will not be able to...
- by Stukkler Tian - at 2012.01.14 22:46:00
|
14. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
1) Thank you for the mid on the retribution. I am a bit worried about a optimal and tracking boost on a laser ship. Scorch plus the ability to swap to muliti in a second make this ship dangerous from all ranges when you give it a tracking boost. ...
- by Stukkler Tian - at 2012.01.14 19:47:00
|
Pages: [1] |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |